IWM iron condor, priced on the real chain
Small-cap beta with an IV surface that is persistently richer than SPY's. Premium sellers like it for that spread; the flip side is that IWM trends hard when rates move and gaps through short strikes more often than the index crowd expects.
An iron condor is two credit spreads: a put spread below the market and a call spread above it. On IWM at $291.2, the Aug 28 condor sells the $275 put and $305 call, buys the $270 put and $310 call, and collects $121. You keep it all if IWM finishes between the short strikes 27 days from now — the engine puts that at 67%.
The trade, priced from the chain
27d to August 28, 2026| Leg | Qty | Price | Δ | IV | Cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SellAug 28 $275 put | 1 | $1.63 | -0.16 | 23% | +$163 |
| BuyAug 28 $270 put | 1 | $1.13 | -0.12 | 25% | −$113 |
| SellAug 28 $305 call | 1 | $1.08 | 0.15 | 16% | +$108 |
| BuyAug 28 $310 call | 1 | $0.37 | 0.07 | 15% | −$37 |
Every leg above is priced at the chain’s own quote — the identical number the builder will show you when you click through (last traded price), captured August 1, 2026 with a 15-minute delay. Only strikes whose print survives an implied-volatility check (within 20% of its own IV) and a no-arbitrage check across the ladder are priced here. Full methodology. Greeks, breakevens, max profit/loss and probability of profit are computed by OptionTracker’s engine at r = 4.2%. Educational analysis, not investment advice.
Yield on the capital this actually ties up
Annualized figures assume the same trade repeats every 27 days at the same premium. Nothing does. Use them to compare strikes and tickers, not to forecast a year.
How a iron condor works
Four legs, one idea: you are selling the market's estimate of how far IWM can travel. The short strikes ($275 / $305) define the range you're renting out; the long wings ($270 / $310) cap what a violent move can cost you.
Both spreads cannot lose. IWM finishes on one side of the market, so at most one vertical goes in the money — which is why max loss is the width of ONE spread minus the credit, $379, not double it. Max profit is the $121 credit, earned by doing nothing.
Breakevens land at $273.79 and $306.21. Outside that band the position loses; between it, it wins. That band is 11.1% wide relative to spot, against 19% implied vol over 27 days.
Return on risk is $121 against $379 — roughly 32% if it works. You need a high hit rate to justify that ratio, which is exactly what the 67% probability is telling you.
When it makes sense
- You expect IWM to chop rather than trend for the next 27 days, and nothing on the calendar argues otherwise.
- IV is elevated and you expect it to fall. At 19% ATM, IWM is the 19th richest of the 20 underlyings on this site; condors are short vega, so a vol crush pays you before time decay does.
- You want defined risk. Unlike a short strangle, the worst case here is a known $379.
- You can name the price at which you would be happy to be wrong, and it is inside the structure rather than outside it.
Where the risk actually is
The risk shape is a plateau with two cliffs. Anywhere between $273.79 and $306.21 you make money; past the long wings you lose a fixed $379. Between short and long strike the P/L slides linearly — that is where most condors are actually managed, not at expiry.
The killer is a trend, not a spike. A slow grind through the short call over three weeks costs the same as a gap and gives you more chances to talk yourself out of closing.
Liquidity is a risk, not a convenience. The moment you most want out of a short-premium position is the moment the spread is widest, and the exit price you modelled at mid will not be available.
What is different about doing this on IWM
The richest index premium on this list, and the one that most reliably pays for itself — small-cap implied vol has run a wider gap over realized than SPY's for years. The catch is trend: IWM does not chop, it goes, and a short strike that looked comfortable at 0.16 delta gets run over in a week when the rate narrative flips.
IWM's Aug 28 strikes are $1 apart near the money (0.34% of spot). At that granularity the strike ladder stops being a constraint on the trade and starts being a genuine choice. 72k contracts of open interest on Aug 28 is workable around the money and thin in the wings — width costs more here than the ladder suggests. 55 strikes on that expiry — 47% of the board — carry prints that agree with their own implied volatility and hold up across the ladder, and those are the strikes priced here. Deep enough for four legs at retail size; the wings thin out faster than on SPY, so cap width at what the book supports.
Skew is ordinary — the 25-delta put implies 4.9% more vol than the 25-delta call, about what an equity surface looks like when nothing unusual is being priced. Neither side of the chain is being singled out, which is the condition under which a symmetric structure like a condor is actually symmetric. The term structure is flat inside 1.5% between the two captured expiries, so there is no calendar edge to harvest and no event visibly priced into one month over the other.
At 19% ATM implied vol, the Aug 28 options are pricing a one-standard-deviation move of $15.01 over 27 days — roughly −5.2% to +5.2%, or $276.19 to $306.21. A short-premium structure here is a bet that 5.2% over 27 days is more than IWM will actually use. That is the thesis, stated honestly.
What actually goes wrong here, as opposed to in general: Selling the wings because the index label implies mean reversion. IWM's realized distribution has fatter shoulders than SPY's at the same implied vol.
Picking the strike on IWM
Condor strike selection is two decisions: how far out the short strikes sit (delta), and how wide the wings are (width). Deltas on IWM at $291.2:
| Band | What it means | When it fits |
|---|---|---|
| 0.10 Δ shorts | ~80% of the distribution inside the band | High win rate, small credit. One loss wipes out several wins — position sizing is everything.On IWM: the Aug 28 $265 put at $0.81, 4% annualized |
| 0.16 Δ shorts | Roughly the 1-standard-deviation band | The most common setup. Credit ≈ 1/3 of width is the usual quality check.On IWM: the Aug 28 $275 put at $1.63, 8% annualized |
| 0.25 – 0.30 Δ shorts | Tighter range, richer credit | Only when you actively expect mean reversion. Gets managed often.On IWM: the Aug 28 $283 put at $2.94, 14% annualized |
| Wing width | Wider wings = more credit, more risk | Width sets max loss. Pick the risk you can size, then find strikes — not the reverse. |
The Aug 28 put chain below gives you real deltas to place the short strikes against. A useful filter: if the credit is less than a quarter of the spread width, the condor is not paying you enough for the tail.
The premium varies 5.3× across the nine strikes below. Everything the delta table is trying to tell you is visible in that gradient. Open interest concentrates at $275 on this expiry, which is usually where the fills are cleanest.
| Strike | vs spot | Mid | Δ | IV | % of spot | Ann. | OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $260 | −10.7% | $0.55 | -0.06 | 28% | 0.2% | 3% | 3.2k |
| $265 | −9.0% | $0.81 | -0.08 | 26% | 0.3% | 4% | 6.2k |
| $271 | −6.9% | $1.22 | -0.12 | 24% | 0.4% | 6% | 237 |
| $273 | −6.2% | $1.41 | -0.14 | 24% | 0.5% | 7% | 269 |
| $275used | −5.6% | $1.63 | -0.16 | 23% | 0.6% | 8% | 10k |
| $277 | −4.9% | $1.92 | -0.19 | 22% | 0.7% | 9% | 320 |
| $279 | −4.2% | $2.22 | -0.22 | 22% | 0.8% | 10% | 346 |
| $281 | −3.5% | $2.70 | -0.25 | 21% | 0.9% | 13% | 141 |
| $283 | −2.8% | $2.94 | -0.29 | 21% | 1.0% | 14% | 130 |
IWM puts expiring August 28, 2026· 15-min delayed capture · “Ann.” annualizes the mid as a percentage of spot over 27 days.
Managing the position
- Have an exit at 2× the credit received in losses. Condors do not recover often enough to justify hoping.
- Manage at 21 days to expiry regardless of P/L. Gamma past that point makes the position behave very differently from the one you opened.
- Duration beats delta for controlling risk. Selling a 45-day option and closing it at 21 days puts you in the flattest part of the gamma curve; selling a 7-day option at the same delta puts you in the steepest.
- Count assignment as an outcome, not an accident. If the plan does not survive being assigned on the worst day of the period, the size is wrong.
Common mistakes
Legging in on four legs
Enter as a single order at a net credit. Chasing individual legs on IWM costs more in slippage than the improved fill you were hoping for.
Selling condors into low IV
At 19% ATM you are being paid for 27 days of IWM risk. If that number is below the name's typical realized vol, the structure has negative edge no matter how pretty the payoff diagram looks.
Selling premium because the credit is large
Credits are large when the market thinks the move might be. Rich premium is a forecast, not a discount, and the two are only distinguishable after the fact.
IWM iron condor FAQ
What is the max loss on this IWM iron condor?
$379 per condor — the width of one vertical minus the $121 credit. It is reached anywhere beyond $270 on the downside or $310 on the upside at August 28, 2026.
Is an iron condor better than a short strangle on IWM?
It is smaller and safer. The strangle collects more premium and has no defined loss; the condor pays the wings to convert an unlimited tail into $379. On a name with rate expectations risk, that insurance is usually worth its cost.
How much is IWM expected to move by Aug 28?
The Aug 28 options imply a one-standard-deviation move of $15.01 — about 5.2% of the IWM share price — over the 27 days to expiry. That is the market's estimate, not a forecast: roughly a third of the time the actual move is larger.
Is IWM option skew favouring puts or calls?
Puts. On the captured Aug 28 chain the 25-delta put implies 4.9% more volatility than the 25-delta call, which is the market charging more for downside protection than for upside exposure.
Build it yourself
Everything above is one construction at one moment. Open it in the builder to drag strikes along the ladder, scrub the expiry, and watch max profit, breakevens and probability of profit recompute live against the real IWM chain — free, no account.
Related reading
- Strike selection with delta and IV"Sell the 30 delta" is the most repeated rule in retail options and nobody can tell you what it means. Here is what delta actually measures, where it stops matching probability, and how far off it gets on a high-IV name.
- What a cash-secured put actually paysThe annualized-return column is the one everybody screenshots. It is also the one that tells you least. Here is the whole ladder — return, probability, breakeven, and the loss that takes six winners to repair.
- The wheel strategy, with real numbersEveryone can recite the four steps. Almost nobody can tell you what a completed cycle returned on the capital it tied up. Here is one, priced off a real chain and folded by the same engine that runs our tracker.
Other IWM strategies
- IWM covered callSell upside on shares you already own and get paid for the cap.
- IWM cash-secured putGet paid to place a limit order below the market.
- IWM bull call spreadBuy a call, sell a higher one — cheaper upside with a ceiling.
- IWM bull put spreadSell a put spread below the market: credit now, defined risk.
- IWM long straddleBuy the call and the put — pay for a move in either direction.
- IWM long strangleOTM call plus OTM put — cheaper than a straddle, needs more move.
- IWM long callDefined-risk upside with a deadline attached.
- IWM long putDefined-risk downside, or insurance with an expiry date.
- IWM calendar call spreadSell the near-dated call, buy the far one — rent time twice.